European Security Convergence Without Agreement, a System Without a Common Authority

Europe is not searching for a new security system; it is trying to survive amidst the ruins of the old one. 💡 We analyze why the NATO-EU architecture is now being challenged from all sides. From the strategic shift of the US toward the Pacific, to the Russian demand for a "multipolar" Europe and the strategic fragmentation of the EU, we explore whether the continent can cease to be a "security consumer" of others.

🔍 What you will see in the analysis:

USA: From Protector to "Overseer": Why Washington no longer considers Europe an existential priority. The Russian Perspective: An analysis of Lavrov's position on "collective security" and the demand for Ukrainian neutrality. Strategic Autonomy or Illusion? The different speeds of France, Germany, and Poland that are paralyzing the EU. Ukraine: Why the conflict is the symptom of a deeper disagreement between Washington and Moscow. The Big Question: Is security a collective good or a tool for imposing power?

[Infographic: The conflicting security narratives of the US, Russia, and the EU in 2026]

💡 The Conclusion: Europe now lives in a fragile balance without a common authority. As long as security is treated as a tool of power rather than a collective good, the continent will remain the field of a long, controlled confrontation.
Like and Subscribe to @Geopolitics-news-gr for analyses that deconstruct the new architecture of global power. WEB Link: Geopolitics-News.gr