Trump's 'Private UN' Geopolitics of Peace or Business of Power

This analysis of the 2026 Board of Peace reveals the most radical and, at the same time, the most cynical shift in international diplomacy since 1945. The transition from "one state, one vote" to "corporate shareholder" is not merely an institutional change; it is the definitive triumph of Transactionalism over International Law.

The fact that peace is treated as a management project with a CEO and a price list transforms geopolitics into a global market where security is the ultimate "premium" product.

What happens when international peace gets a price tag? 💡 We analyze the emergence of the Board of Peace in early 2026. This is a "Private UN" that replaces collective diplomacy with a corporate governance model. Why does participation require a financial contribution, and how does the "Pay-to-Join" model forever change the fate of smaller states, such as Greece?

🔍 What you will see in the analysis:

CEO instead of Diplomat: The executive power of the Council President and the abolition of vetoes.

Pay-to-Play: How political influence is directly linked to each state's financial stake.

The Plan for Gaza: The first application of technocratic peace as an investment "management project."

International Reactions: The EU's shock, condemnation by Russia/China, and the opportunity for Gulf states.

Greece's Dilemma: How does a country that relies on International Law survive in a system that favors only powerful shareholders?

💡 The Conclusion:
The Board of Peace is a symptom of a world where security ceases to be a universal right and becomes a privilege for those with the liquidity to purchase it. The era of rules is ending; the era of transactions is here.

Like and Subscribe to @Geopolitics-news-gr for analyses that deconstruct the new architecture of global power.
WEB Link: Geopolitics-News.gr