Greenland for Ukraine The Return of Spheres of Influence Politics

The analysis of the hypothetical 'Greenland for Ukraine' scenario touches the core of the 2026 post-liberal international order: the prevalence of transactionalism (transactional diplomacy) over traditional institutional commitments.

Although the scenario resembles a geopolitical 'human trafficking' of states, it reflects a raw truth: for Washington, the Arctic is the 'new El Dorado' of strategic surveillance and resources, while Ukraine remains a costly front of attrition.

Can an entire country be 'exchanged' for strategic influence in another? 💡 We analyze the 'Greenland for Ukraine' scenario circulating in diplomatic corridors in 2026. This is not a conspiracy theory, but the ultimate symbol of a new era: an era where security is a commodity for trade. Why are the US 'dying' for Greenland, and how is European dependence on Ukraine being turned into a lever of pressure?

🔍 What you will see in the analysis:

The Value of Greenland: The Pituffik base, rare earth elements, and control of new Arctic sea routes.

Security for Security: How Washington might demand 'quid pro quo' to continue protecting Europe’s eastern front.

The End of Sovereign Equality: What the return to 19th-century 'spheres of influence' means for international law.

The Position of Denmark and the EU: The internal frictions that could dissolve European cohesion.

The Precedent: If the West does it, what stops Russia and China from implementing the same model?

💡 The Conclusion:
Whether the deal is realistic or not, the mere discussion reveals Europe's strategic nakedness. 'Strategic autonomy' is no longer an choice; it is a necessity for survival if the EU does not want to see its security being traded at tables it does not control.

Like and Subscribe to @Geopolitics-news-gr for analyses that deconstruct the new architecture of global power.
WEB Link: Geopolitics-News.gr