The Obstacles to a New Nuclear Treaty Between the USA and Russia
Subscription is free and only requires an email. There are no advertisements, algorithms, or commercial use of your data. The content is sent directly to you, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
Nuclear control has died—not due to a technical error, but as a strategic choice. 💡 We analyze why Washington, Moscow, and Beijing can no longer agree even on the basics. From the U.S. demand for China’s inclusion to Russia’s insistence on non-strategic weapons and the role of India, we explore how the ambition for global hegemony is shattering global security.
🔍 What you will see in the analysis:
The End of Cold War Rationality: Why "Mutually Assured Destruction" no longer functions as a guarantee of peace.
The China Trap: Why Beijing refuses to enter trilateral agreements and how this suits American strategy.
Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons: Russia’s ultimate tool against NATO’s superiority.
France & Britain: Why Moscow demands that European arsenals be counted in any future agreement.
The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: How the modernization of nuclear arsenals transforms threat prediction into actual danger.
[Table comparing the nuclear arsenals and strategic doctrines of the US, Russia, and China in 2026]
💡 The Conclusion: The problem is not the number of warheads, but the inability to accept a world without absolute hegemony. Nuclear stability is now a hostage of an era that refuses to die, while the new one has yet to be born.
Like and Subscribe to @Geopolitics-news-gr for analyses that deconstruct the new architecture of global power. WEB Link: Geopolitics-News.gr